Wednesday 30 October 2013

Chin up!

I bought myself a new sketchbook and a couple of new fine line markers, and dug out my Mum's old colander.  Desite feeling a complete wuss, I sat down and had a couple of attempts at drawing it.  The first was a bit too deep in the bowl, but the second is quite pleasing.

There have been no photos on this blog so far due to computer problems. However we have a new computer, and connection, and new camera.  So tomorrow, while I am having new wires on my teeth, I am going to delegate Jim to work out how to use all the new kit to add photos of work and exhibitions over the last few days.

Watch this space.
Colander - too deep

Rolling pi

Colander

Jug - that is always half full!

Pastry cutters

Tuesday 29 October 2013

Having a wobble

Yesterday I had a really hard day at uni.  I was presenting my progress to date, and it went really badly.  Antje was not interested in all the research I had done to get my ideas in order; she did not like any of my samples; she did not like my ideas for application to objects; or ideas on where to site my finished work.  Feedback received was that I should be working towards fine hand drawing of worn domestic objects for application as fine art pieces, mostly likely made up as little panels for the wall.  I am really hacked off with this.  I loathe and despise little art panels for the wall.  Someone even said my artwork in Wreck This Journal was pretty!  This comment really upset and hurt me.

Then I went upstairs to see the textile technician, wanting to just lick my wounds, and got told "don't be stubborn.  If you want a first, then you need to make art pieces".  This irritated me even more.  I don't find emotive labelling helpful, getting a first is not critical to me, particularly if it involves me compromising my integrity; and I get so tired of pointless art pieces - they bore me.

So this morning I went for a swim, (Keri Smith says "move your body") and had a think about it.  If I wanted to do fine art, I would have done a fine art degree.  I want to apply my art to useful objects.  The object has a deeper meaning, and I can see all sorts of analogies between women's work, and art applied to working objects.

Two students were kind enough to write up the feedback while I was presenting.

Work can be placed in places other than just female specific sites ie Women's Library
My tutor Steve had said I needed to identify a specific suitable site to fit my theme, as I don't want to make commercial objects with a message, or create installation pieces.  Therefore I had to identify a site that fitted my domestic objects.  Yet, now I am being told site is unimportant, art installation is a better goal.

Cushions are a secondary art form
To the art establishment, quite possibly they are.  However I am not seeking to be the next Damien Hirst, or a commercial artist.  I am playing with the concept of representing women's work on a working  object, such as a cushion or lining, where the functionality of the object shows a parallel of improving life's experience while being easily overlooked.

Consider working with folded and draped fabrics  - to give respect to the art piece
I am not sure how folding and draping gives respect.

Explore linocuts further - there is an element of purity about them.

Draw many more kitchen utensils.  Draw a colander with more detail.  Draw older kitchen tools.  Draw the feeling of the piece.  
I agree that I need to draw more - when I am peaceful and contented.

Elegance and delicacy.  Element of purity in drawings.  More observation of kitchen.  Draw, Draw, Draw.  
I find it most surprising when people say my best work is the very detailed and complete drawings.  I like the ones that are freely drawn, not accurate but energetic.  This is when I can see the affection and respect in the object drawn.

Images selected are very important - must be refined.  Images in Wreck this Journal seem more attractive.  
I find defining my "best" images very difficult.  Sometimes people like the free fast drawings, other like the detailed cross hatching.

Quality of prints needs to be more sharp.  Make them more defined; more detail, not like the colander linocut.  
Most people who saw the linocut colander really liked the simplicity of it.  Now I am being told to do the detailed cross hatching, which was slated last term for being "careful shading".

Single objects.  Put more than one object on the print.  Consider use as place mats; tea towels; table cloths etc.  More celebration to the object.
My work is refining and becoming simpler, as my life simplifies.  I don't want to put more than one item on each drawing.  I am not into layering and making work busier.  Increasingly I realise my work speaks more when there is a selective placement of the drawing in space.  Creating multiples or repeats in my work does not add to the message.

Consider the alternative to the cushion. Does not need to be used on a functional item.  It can be looked at to be admired rather than just function based.
I really struggle with this.  I feel this says "make something 'just' to be admired" as being worthy for pure decoration, and that functionality is a dirty word.

Take a specific item and create a story from it eg measuring jug - you need to measure everything to cook.  
This is what I thought I had been doing!

You don't need an application yet.  
So why did I have to write a proposal last month, that defined what I was going to make, and against which I will be measured?

Take the theme further.  Consider Sunday roast; jam; bread; soup; ingredients.  
Yes, I can do this.

So some samples of printing on flour bags.  Relationship between materials and object.    Narrative!!!  
So why did my use of muslin, as a fabric that is used in cooking to strain fluids, get rubbished?  I  thought this contributed to the narrative of what I was making.  I can draw on flour bags, and print from them.  My narrative of the analogy between women's work and the domestic object appears completely lost.

Use numbers that relate to being recognised for volume of work undertaken.
I did this on the Yokes piece, very successfully.  I have not added words and numbers to samples for this year yet, as I was exploring fabrics, dyes and techniques.

Take the best of what worked last year and expand
This is what I am trying to do.  And obviously failing!

Try to discover what you like about the kitchen - is it meal preparation; everyday meals; celebration meals; food ingredients?
What I am interested in is the huge volumes of under-valued work that women do.   I want to provide recognition of the repetitive, often unthanked work that women do, and give it value by portraying it on fabric that can be used.  The everyday use of fabric is important to me, as my work is not about being portrayed in art galleries, where it might be looked at for a few seconds, then forgotten:  it is about a portrayal in any environment where you find people who benefit from women's work, so it can be domestic or public service environment (eg library).

It is about the everyday, mundane, repetitive cooking tasks that provide wholesome, nutritious food that is often taken for granted.  It is about the manual processes and the tools.  Not specific ingredients.  Not specific occasions, but the mundane times and humble objects that should be valued.

Possibly draw on to flour bags and other wrappings
OK

There needs to be a story.  More detail needed. Last year's work told a detailed story.  
Agreed.  I want to expand on this story.

Possibly find another story, another narrative.
No.  My work is about people who are under-valued.  I may move on to other themes such as the under-valued work done by migrant workers but I will save this for higher level studies.

Colour is very important
Previously my work was very high colour.  The final Yokes piece last year was monochrome, which is unusual for me, but at the moment I am struggling to incorporate colour into my work.


I find the whole situation very demoralising.


Monday 28 October 2013

A weekend away in Bradford

Jim and I had a lovely weekend away in Bradford, where  I went to the Cloth & Memory 2 exhibition.  This was staged in Salt's Mill, Saltaire. Titus Salt built and ran the largest mill space in Britain in the Victorian era.  It was a vertical process mill, where the raw angora fibres were brought into the mill, in the attic space, and it was processed through various stages before emerging on the ground floor as fully finished woollen cloth.

Gallery looking to left

Gallery looking to right

The exhibition was staged in the spinning room, which was the attic.  This is a huge unsupported ceiling space, full of peeling paint, dust and wool fibres.  The exhibition was wonderful to go round on Friday, but made more sense on Saturday, when the Curator's tour explained the rationale behind each piece.  My only criticism of the exhibition was that although artists' work was credited, there was no artists statement by each piece, and the rationale was only explained during the Curator's tour.

Lesley Millar said artists had been invited to respond to the space, and consider Cloth & Memory in relation to the spinning room at Salts Mill.  My favourite pieces were:

Peta Jacobs, Shadows of distinction.  A 6m x 2.5m screen printed piece of cotton silk devore.  The devore had destroyed the weft fibres so the imagery was apparent by the areas hanging in shreds.  The image was taken from a 1952 photo of wool merchants outside the Bradford Wool Exchange - middle aged men, the picture of affluence, prior to the collapse of the wool industry 5 years later  The devore piece was hung behind a sheet of calico and illuminated from behind, so it was the shadow that produced the image.  A really ghostly image.

Peta Jacobs "Shadows of Distinction"

Taken from a photo of wool merchants outside the Wool Exchange 1953/4

Devore print makes these men into shadows.

Caren Garfen, Reel Lives.  Caren Garfen had researched the names of all the workers at Salts Mill in 1891, from the Census, the recorded the details of these women on tiny "blue plaques" on the  end of cotton reels, representing the bobbins at the mill.  Each reel had a ribbon extending from it, detailing their address, and maybe a comment on the role of women in the mill.  When Jim and I walked around the mill, we saw a lot of the addresses within 100m of the mill.  Apparently Titus Salt was a philanthropist who built a model village immediately alongside the mill, to provide housing for his workers.  While I suspect the women were very low paid, a tied cottage probably improved their lot. Caren Garfen had obviously done a huge amount of research to support her work, and it was wonderfully worked in meticulous detail.

Caren Garfen's Reel Lives

Reel Lives

This strip lists all the jobs available to men

The strip just visible at the left of the apron lists the jobs available to women

When there is a column of bobbins, more than one woman employee lived at the address

A cloth burler was a higher paid employee, and removed burls from the thread.
If this did not get removed, the work of many women was spoiled

Only two married women were employed - a childless woman, and a widow.
Married women were expected to be at home, caring for husband and children

Caroline Bartlett had done 14 large embroidery hoops with woollen fabric embroidered with a fabric manipulation process, with a ceramic piece in the centre of each one, that was embossed with the imprint of the process eg smocking.  It was absolutely wonderful.  This represented home, work and domestic life.  The hoop represented domestic and environment of the mill.  Lesley Millar said that in her opinion Caroline had produced her life's best work with this piece.

Caroline Bartlett "Stilled" 

Impressed porcelain roundel with embroidery flowing into fabric


Fabric touching ground to show how staining from oily floor would form

Row of 14 hoops.  For sale at c#13,000.
Worth every penny for the concept, respect and skill

At the seminar afterwards, Maxine Bristow had some interesting things to say:

Too much material awareness holds back the significance of textile work.
Work needs to be accessible.  You need to be able to convey what is in your head - otherwise the audience may not get it.
Space between objects can be as powerful as the work (Salts Mill is absolutely huge)
You need to be clear about the difference between memory/remembrance/memorial and what your work is targetting.
Textile writing can be a liberation/harness.  Maxine Bristow writes for herself, although her blog (Through the Surface) is public and has been cited on MA courses as a recommended text.  She uses her writing to engage her thoughts and inform her making.  Critics usually limit themselves to writing and critiquing, and do not make as well. (I really get this!).  She finds writing makes tangible the intangible.  Writing forces thinking.  Writing a proposal  forces the making to evolve and become tangible.  The practice of writing validates making process.  Journalling gave a framework to chunter and resolve.  Thinking occurs.  Space  for possibilities.  However there is a conflict between writing seriously and writing clearly.  Serious writing should also be clear, although serious writing often excludes.  This is the challenge of being a worthy writer - to write inclusively and clearly.

This was a lovely weekend, and most thought provoking.

Sunday 27 October 2013

Feedback on last year's students results

We had  a session with Antje, reviewing why last year's students achieved their results.  Key points were:

Good points:

Good use of material culture (useful objects in appropriate designs)
Good development of ideas.
Strong concept.
Good development from 2D to 3D
Original materials - concrete and leather
Installation site innovative
Photos of work well sited
Beautifully worked retro embroidery
Good sketchbook work
Well made and purposeful.
Well displayed.
Good sampling.
High quality making.
Integrated domestic materials with uniform
Each jacket had a theme.
Holistic and concept well embedded.
Excellent presentation.
Well documented in sketchbook.
Photos enhanced presentation
Good observational drawing
Unusual representation of good drawing
Simple pattern used in many different ways.
Considerable ambition - worked in situ
Lots of supporting work.
Made own clays.
Made original forms
Well patterned and decorated
Risk taking with wires
Ambitious forms
Persistent drawing of pets.
Line drawings worked
Lots of supporting work
Solid development from observation
Drawing - observation - digital devt - contextualise
Excellent ceramic timeline
Good use of spectacle pattern
Supporting material - pushed pattern
Good use of words.
Lots of sampling
Excellent quality of print
Different fabrics
Well made.
Colour and simplicity - healing process of colour
Excellent combination of all work

Poor points:

Too much work in repetition
Poorly finished
Not enough volume of work
Poor quality workmanship
Poor print and framing
Imagery blurry and disguised
Patterns from 1st semester, not new design for 2nd semester
Poorly ironed.
Concept should be more critically developed and become more challenging
Needs to go outside comfort zone - too nice
Student did not listen to feedback.
Fans did not fit message
Applied fabric cumbersome; fell apart; threads did not enhance.
Too bright colours - not dark like fairytale
Context of modern figures not appropriate.  Very samey.
Lost the message
No critical engagement; no why
Safe
Poorly made
Awful material choice
Work fell down, badly made and wonky. Appalling display
Does not listen to advice - did not make scarves as advised - failed on reassessment
Did not take advice to move away from twee beach scene
Poor finishing
Photos collated - v little challenge or development
Lacked finesse
More contextual enagement required
Too straightforward
Poorly finished
Poor display
Lack of work produced
Poor standard of work
Lack of back up work.

I need to take this on board.  I can see legitimate criticism of my own work in the above negative comments!

Thursday 24 October 2013

Two exhausting days

It's been a couple of busy days.  I have been chasing applied art exhibitions.  Yesterday I went to the Contemporary Applied Art Gallery in Southwark, followed by the V&A Embroidery & Tapestry lecture.

The CAA gallery has a current exhibition of Model: Making which although detailed, did not particularly interest me.  Lots of 3D printing that shows the development from 2D to 3D in form. However the layout and lighting of lots of applied art pieces was fascinating.  It is a gallery that sells furniture, ceramic, glass, textile, metal and jewellery.  The exhibitions change every 6-8 weeks so there is good reason to return on a regular basis and it is also en-route to Tate Britain so easy to pop in.  I had quite a chat to the assistant and she said the jewellery and textiles were the best sellers, which surprised me a bit.  I thought textile would be passé but, having looked at what textiles were on display, there were some lovely screen printed cushions that fitted a lovely 3 seater bench (#1,600) and lots of lovely scarves priced from #45-#175, which might fit them into the trendy London gift market.

Helen Carnac had a panel of 5 enamel pieces c3" x 2", totalling #2,440.  These were individually drawn, scratched and rusted.  A very rough and ready finish but very, very appealing.  Jewellery was on display in various media and prices started at #30 to #150 depending on maker and media.  Ceramics and glass were lovely, and all showed the mark of the hand, often by making globular objects not perfectly spherical.  Absolutely lovely.  Clear glass was beautifully lit, so the imperfections in the glass formed shadows on a white wall.

The V&A lecture was great, but as it was about foreign embroidery and tapestry, and this is not my field, I'm not going to write up my notes!

This morning I had my swim, and during this, identified the conclusions about my practice that I want to draw in my presentation on Monday.  1. My work is all about me; 2. My work is all about women; and 3. It is all about respect and recognition of under-valued people. (This might also be the entree for thought for a Masters, in that I could also get very interested in work done by migrant workers).

Today I went with Jim to see the Pinpoint Exhibition at One Church Street.  Vanda was selected to exhibit and her combined found objects (broken scissors and chandelier pendant) looked fantastic.  I unexpectedly met friends from another textile group there.  It was most interesting to consider how different people read the exhibition.  Libby et al appeared to look at the work as textile makers, find their friends' and peers' work, recognise the familiarity and admire it.  Whereas I got the book of artists statements, identified the work that intrigued me, and read the artist's reasoning behind the piece.

I liked Richard McVetis' piece 5 O'clock Shadow.  This was a grid of tiny hand stitches, with a voided person towards one corner.  He referred to the majesty and grandeur of the hand, seeking silent and subtle qualities by filling space intuitively, making thought permanent and representing day-to-day activities.  This appeals to me as I like the mundane, and the link with the intimacy of hand stitch.  I also  very much like black and white at the moment (which is unusual for me, as I am usually a colourist).

Charlotte Brown had hand cast a lead medal, mounted on a fine knitted silk ribbon.  This was commenting on medals, awarded for heroics, that actually represent on a very grim situation. She used lead - a non-precious metal, and knitted silk worked on defunct machinery.  Her traditional techniques address human experience.  I very much comprehend this.  She is making "invested objects" - things imbibed with emotional worth that outweighs a material value.  She uses honest materials to disconcert and defy expectation in the manner in which they are combined.  Absolutely wonderful concept of materials.  Her practice is researched in Freud and repression - another field for me to read around (just not yet, save this one for later!).

I am now home, have made bread and soup, and we are just relaxing before tea.  Then tomorrow we rush off to Bradford to see Cloth & Memory 2.  But at least I can say I have taken on board the feedback to look at more applied art.

Tuesday 22 October 2013

More thinking

I had an interesting conversation with Liz and Karen, MA students at Herts today. Liz came out with a profoundity that caught my attention.  Liz thinks there is a critical difference between craft and art, in that applied artists, who create craft, are quite happy for their work to be handled, whereas fine artists do not want their work touched so make it more remote by framing behind glass or displaying in a cabinet.  I feel very strongly that I want my work handled because this informs my thinking and it is important to be accessible.

This also relates to the status debate between Art and Craft.  I seem to listen to a lot of conversations that rail against the lower status of Craft in comparison to Art.  I do get fed up of them.  I am working in the craft sphere, in the fortunate position where I do not need to earn my living from it, and am enjoying the thought process and haptic sensations of making.  My interaction with the materials is largely inward facing, and all about me.  It is not outward facing and about external recognition or money or commerciality.  I am interested in the value of everyday, mundane materials and under-valued people and their activities, and arguments about status seem singularly irrelevant.  I get irritated when I feel pushed towards making art objects on the grounds that they are more interesting or valid (on the grounds that it becomes Art) rather than a tactile object with a purpose (that makes it Craft).  I am interested in the tactility of the object, irrespective of its status as defined by others (possibly a paternalistic Art Establishment?)

I have been reading Vision and Difference, Femininity, Feminism and the Histories of Art, by Griselda Pollock.  I have been considering my views on the role of women and domestic space.  I like things that are domestic and mundane.  As a woman who has worked full time for 30 years in male dominated manual industry, I find the home very much a sanctuary, where I enjoy spending time.  My working life was non-typical of my female comparators and peer group.  Pollock refers to European bourgeoisie as a class founded upon inequality and difference of social/financial class and of gender.  It compartmentalised the public and private and allocated these by gender.  Men controlled the public arenas of commerce, politics, government, law and public service, and women were restricted to the private arena of the home.  Women were therefore deprived of money and power, but were given social status by not needing to work.  As value systems within art are created by and run for men, it appears to me that art is designed for the public environment and is allocated higher status, and work (craft) created for the domestic situation, usually by women, is therefore lower status.  My experience as a woman, as a craft worker, and of working in public service challenges this view of status.  Public/private is not better/worse but merely different because the benefits are measured in different ways.

Pollock says women's work is stereotyped because of social systems that product expectations based on gender.  She analyses the work of Mary Cassatt and Berthe Morisot to demonstrate that the environments they portray are domestic spaces, whereas male impressionists were frequenting bars, cafes, backstage

Sunday 20 October 2013

In the thick of it

I feel completely exhausted.  I spent a day at Vanda's class, working with text, then had an evening out at a lecture by Drusilla Cole, followed by a day at Aunt Audrey's, investigating 1950s coats.

In Vanda's class we were working with text, starting with creating different text backgrounds.  I used the words "Women's work" using thick paint, and charcoal in assorted styles.  My work was ok, but the Karin, Jane and Brenda all did much more inspirational versions than me.  Then we worked on drawing an object on a book index, an image, and a piece of corrugated card.  I drew a biscuit on each one, as it fits with my cooking theme.  Once again, everyone else's work looked better than mine, but that's the way it goes sometimes.







As usual Vanda gave me some feedback that was well observed and useful.  I have recently been to the Paul Klee exhibition at the Tate, and although glad I went, his style of art was not to my taste.  Vanda observed that I go to most of the big exhibitions, but not to applied art galleries.  This is true, and I conclude that I am not making best use of my time before my finals next year.  So I have put a note on Facebook to all our student group, that I am going to various exhibitions (like Pinpoint) and applied art galleries, suggesting that if anyone wants to come with me, they are welcome.  I am very much enjoying the V&A lectures in London, and just need to add a visit to a small gallery each week beforehand, to hit this particular target.

The lecture by Drusilla Cole was a delight. Lots of images of pattern from a variety of sources, but key points were: visual interest requires:

Different colours - contrast, different values are important
Shapes - larger shapes dominate
Sizes - larger sizes dominate
Subject matter - different objects vary in attention seeking.

I very much enjoy listening to knowledgeable people talking about their subject.

On Friday I went to see Aunt Audrey, (aged 83) to see whether she had any old 1950s coats that I could reline for my exhibition.  I was confident that, as the family hoarder, she would have plenty of coats I could use.  Unfortunately I think her daughter has been quietly turning out cupboards and disposing of anything time-expired, and I do hope I have not caused an argument, by raising the subject of ancient clothing!  Still, we had a lovely day, discussing my theme of Women's Work, and Aunt Audrey, as an ex Domestic Science teacher, was most supportive of my ideas.

However when I got home, a 1950s dress pattern that I bought on Ebay arrived.  I plan to make this up with my own fabric printed with kitchen utensils, for me to wear at our final year show.  I have also started knitting a cardigan with laceweight turquoise wool that will have three-quarter length sleeves that will look fantastic (I hope) to go with the dress.

Wednesday 16 October 2013

Paul Klee and the V&A

Today I went to Tate Modern in the morning, followed by my Tapestry and Embroidery lecture at the V&A.

The Paul Klee exhibition was very interesting, and very extensive.  There were about 10 rooms of his work, from all over the world, showing how his work evolved over his lifetime.  He was a Swiss born German, whose work was labelled degenerate by the Nazis, and who had to leave Germany during the 1930s for this reason.  It is just a pity that I concluded that his work is not to my taste!  He was fascinated by colour, and so am I but I found his colours across this exhibition to be sombre and murky, even when light toned.  The most interesting thing I identified, surprised me.  Some of his early works were described as "from a private collection".  I wondered the reason for this.  Possibly a collector might not want to be known as an owner of valuable artworks for security reasons, but could it also potentially be that when the Nazis looted artworks during the WWII, subsequent owners are reluctant to identify themselves as they might need to provide provance?  But would prestigious galleries use, such works?  Or not?  Food for thought.  (Vanda says a prestigious organisation like the Tate would not be so stupid!).

This week's lecture at the V&A was Embroidery for the Home: Exotic-Realistic 1620-1870.  After the 100 years war in France, Arras, previous centre of tapestry was in ruins and the City of Tournai, the main competitor, prospered.  It was intermittently fought over by Henry (II?) and the French King Charles and ownership of the city changed in 1513, 1516 and 1521.  This led to tapestry weavers becoming refugees who  moved to Harlem, Delft and Munich in small workshops and in Brussels in large units.  Tapestries were now worked in Sets, or 'chambers' (english term) to cover all the walls of a room.  Several scenes were shown in each tapestry.

Tapestries were changing in style.  Old tapestries were looking old fashioned with their flat styling.  Nuances of painting were desired in tapestry and the weaver became the imitator of realisstic art.  Raphael was commissioned in 1519 by the Pope to design tapestries to enhance papal chambers in the style of the Sistine Chapel (as created in 1508-12).  As tapestries were highly valuable, they were stolen in the Sack of Rome 1520, then returned to the papacy in 1540, unfortunately damaged.  Then these tapestries were stolen by Napoleon.

With the change in style, weaving had to change.  Tapestries were woven from side to side, and up to 7 weavers sat side by side, positioned to their skill level.  Skies required least skills, faces most, so depending on where the most complicated weaving was positioned, was where the most skilled weaver sat.   With the limited range of dyed wools, weavers sometimes used paint after to enhance form, until in 1538 there was an edict, banning the use of paint, except for faces where it was accepted modelling was virtually impossible without a bit of help.  When weavers worked from a cartoon, they had to adapt the designs as they wove, because they knew fugitive dye colours aged differently to paint.  They tried to avoid using yellow dyes as they were not stable.  Quality marks on tapestry began in 1528 with the Brussels tapestries.  They used a shield between two Bs as a standard mark.  

In 1517 Martin Luther wrote the 95 Theses.  This was a catalyst for Protestants to devolve from the Catholic church.   Henry VIII & Cardinal Wolsey were extraordinarily rich.  When Cardinal Wolsey failed to gain divorce for Henry VIII it led to his downfall in 1559.  The Great Hall at Hampton Court was removed from Cardinal Wolsey and taken over by Henry VIII.  After the birth of Edward, Henry VIII commissioned 10 tapestries from Brussels weaver workshops of the story of Abraham.  Henry paid 10 x the cost of a fully fitted warship for the set of 10 tapestries, including plenty of gold thread.  In 1649 they were valued at #8,260.  Henry VIII linked himself to Abraham, the biblical leader of the Israelites, because God rewarded Abraham, an older father, with a much sought-after son.  Henry VIII owned c2,500 tapestries, which were displayed when the King was in residence.  These were carefully kept by the Master of the Wardrobe and were displayed at various coronations and in the Kings Bedchamber.

Embroidery for the home has always been popular.  Crewel work was in vogue in the 17th century.  Thin worsted woolen thread was worked on fustion ground fabric.  Fusion has a linen warp and cotton weft and makes a very hard wearing embroidery fabric.  Fustion has a twill weave, woven 20" wide, therefore drapes well.  It was worked with long & short stitch, with careful shading.  Frequently used for bed hangings and workbags.  Workbags were large as they were used to store large hanks of wool.  Any broderer or gentlewoman was expected to be competent at crewel work - simple stitches that demonstrated skill in how they were combined.

The Vyvyan bed coverlet was worked in 1715 and had pineapples embroidered on it.  Pineapples were rare, and were often rented for display at the society dinner party, therefore were deemed suitable as a motif on exotic embroidery.  Furniture was commissioned to display embroiderer's work eg chairs.  In the 17th century floristry ws in vogue and embroidered flowers changed to meet fashion.  Florists clubs reduced the range of flowers so violas, honeysuckle and peapods disappeared from fashion and anenomes  appeaared.  Crewel and canvaswork went out of vogue from mid 18th century and what remains tends to be professional work as it was so expensive to commission.  For example an embroidered man's waistcoat was priced at 10 guineas when an average man's annual wage was #15.

By 1806 the Jane Austen style was in vogue.  White muslin rivalled silk in popularity.  Both were embellished with whitework, either in chain stitch or tambour work (with a hook).  Crochet developed from tambour work in the 1820s.

By the end of the 18th century realism was in vogue.  Berlin woolwork appeared in the 19th century.  Wools and patterns originally were imported from Berlin and the embroidery was worked in tent or cross stitch on canvas with careful shading, using 100s of dyed threads.  A colour chart was supplied so  the right colours could be worked.  It was rare to get a charted design before this.  Patterns could be beaded.  Berlin woolwork disappears by 1870.  It was popular to work useful items like slippers.  Embroidered slipper uppers could be taken to a showmaker to have made up and would cost as much to make up, as to buy whole!

Tuesday 15 October 2013

Hard Reading

I am still trying to work out for myself why I want to use textile stitch and print to express myself.  I found a very interesting article in a book of essays Objects and Meaning edited by Fariello & Owen.      The essay Feminism, Crafts & Knowledge by Michele Hardy made a lot of sense.

This discussed how different types of knowledge are valued.  First wave feminism had the realisation that women were treated differently to men and that women wanted to be treated equally.  Then second wave feminism challenged patriarchy and the hegemony of the dominant discourse.  We are now in 3rd wave feminism which tries to dismantle the modes of exclusion and recognise subjective possessors of knowledge.    These definitions are fluid and may change as my understanding evolves.

Scientific methods of measuring knowledge indicate that objectivity, 'pure' reason and empiricism are privileged as the means of understanding.  This unclouded by bias or emotion.  However this means the scientist is autonomous but alienated and privileges theory over experience, quantitative over qualitative, detachment over responsibility.  Loraine Code, in 'What She Knows' states feminists question this, because it excludes women and 'traditional' skills from who counts as knowers and what counts as known.  Women's repeated experience is not given authoritative epistemic validity, but is belittled by calling it 'old wives tales', 'gossip' or 'witchcraft'.  This is gender politics at work in patriarchal societies.  Women's knowledge is subjugated and trivialised by those in power on the grounds of ideal objectivity.  Knowledge gained by experience of sensory objects in formed by the subjectivity of its knowers, ie women.

Many knowers are unrecognised and devalued by science and philosophies modelled on science.  In my opinion this attitude to knowledge was formed in Victorian times when reading was compulsorily taught in schools, and those who could read and write well were more valued than those who did not.  It would be natural for the teacher/person in authority to favour those who were 'like me' because they could demonstrate academic ability.  The abilities of those who did manual work (eg any form of service or apprenticeship) were less valued than those who did mental work.

Dualist concepts seem to state one is better than the other, or is more credible - female/male; nature/culture; subjective/objective.  My experience of people justifying their actions in the workplace, often comes down to a claim of a particular view being right (due to objectivity!), when in reality there is a lot of justification for a one side of an argument, and the other side being totally ignored (which is what I think is subjectivity).

Modern craft feminism is not about patriarchal scapegoats or victimhood - it acknowledges grey areas between poles.  It creates areas for discussion - to explore, re-evaluate personal experience and is subjective in the construction of knowledge.  We need to use both emotion and intellect to create and sustain knowledge, rather than seeing them as opposites.

Typically, feminism shows value in epistemic, moral and economic terms, when contrasted to objective, scientific models.  There is potential for multiple possibilities - intuitive, experiential and aesthetic ways of knowing.  There are many right answers - we just need to be able to see them.

I need to go back to the essay and look at what it said about use of feminine crafts.  I only noted what it said about feminism and thought, not the practical application to craft!

Thursday 10 October 2013

The Knit & Stitch at the Ally Pally

I had an amazing day out at the Knitting & Stitching Show  at the Alexandra Palace. I attend more to look at modern textile artists work in the galleries, than to shop, although I do usually end up buying something that I would find difficult to source elsewhere (this time turquoise lace weight wool).

First I found Harriet Riddell, a UH graduate from 2 years ago.  She had a stand where she was doing her stitched portraits.  As the show had just opened and she had not had any customers yet, I sat down and she drew me on her sewing machine.  As she started to sew, it gathered a crowd, so I told them all about Harriet's achievements: achieved a first at Uni; won a prize at New Designers last year; won the One Year On prize; now at the Knit & Stitch in only her second year.  And when parties of schoolgirls took photos, I asked them to credit the artist when using the photos in their sketchbooks.  From that point on, I think she sewed portraits all day long.  15 minutes to do each portrait, £35.  Great value.

The Embroiderers Guild had a gallery where they had textile competition prize winners displaying their work.  The EG are to be commended for doing this, as they had funded stands for about 12 graduates to show their work, and all the artists I spoke to on this gallery would not have been able to fund it themselves.  Bethany Walker had worked lime green pom-poms in a style reminiscent if a sprey of flowers and set them in small blocks of quick drying cement.  These were wall mounted on very sturdy steel hook and ring settings.  Very original and very effective.  Susan Syddall had drawn telegraph poles and electricity pylons.  She had worked direct into an A3 rag paper sketchbook, using brusho paints, then incredibly, machine sewed black outlines around the telegraph poles. Made good use of space.  Nothing crowded.  Lovely use of colour.  She had also made up some professional photo books of her work.  Great idea.  

Wednesday 9 October 2013

Suffragettes at Tate Britain and Lecture at V&A

This is a really busy week.  I went to the Tate today (on the wrong day at the wrong Tate venue for an exhibition) but it was fortuitous as I discovered something unknown.

The Tate had a wonderful exhibition room about Sylvia Pankhurst, her art, and her work for the Women's Social & Political Union, for suffragettes.  She gave up her art as she did  not want to  be financially beholden to bourgoise women, but rather focus all her energies on the campaign for Votes for Women. There were examples of her art, but also a brooch she designed for women once they were released from prison for offences such as arson in the name of the cause.  The brooch was about 1"square, of a portcullis (representing Court and justice in the UK) with a convict arrow coloured with green, white and purple stripes, mounted on top.  Absolutely beautiful.  Purple for dignity, white for purity, green for hope.

Also there was always a celebratory breakfast when a woman was released from prison, and there was a promotional tea set in Suffrage colours, stamped with a Pankhurst design. Also very interesting was a 4 page letter from Olivia Pender and Hester Reeve from the Women's Library arguing the case for a display of Pankhurst's work by the Tate as representing an interesting phase in social/political artwork within history. Very, very well written and just the sort of stuff aspiring graduates should read.

Also in this room (off Room 1890) was a display of work researched in 1973-5 by Margaret Harrison, Kay Unit and Mary Kelly.  Women & Work, A document on the Division of Labour in Industry.  This was a couple of videos of women doing basic manual machine operation in a tin box factory in Peckham, with a lot of stills of hands doing manual work of different types, eg feeding a hopper with tin lids, attaching a bent metal handle etc.  The population of women was very diverse, as shown by head and shoulders shots of women on the shopfloor.  The display noted how many women and men did each type of job and commented that men did higher paid jobs.  There was a display of attendance sheets, and you could see that although people were sent home or to hospital sick, everyone returned the following day.  I suspect there was no sick pay!  Another lovely exhibition.  Just what I like.

This week's lecture at the V&A was "Simple stitches used in a complicated way.  Double running and buttonhole stitch".

We were shown an embroidery of a man and woman dated 1661.  It was different on the back to the front, as it had originally been worked in double running stitch, then had been overworked in buttonhole stitch on the front.  Double running stitch, or Holbein stitch is where running stitch is worked twice, giving a continuous line, both front and back.  I find it only really works if worked in the same direction, as if you sew out and back, it messes up the tension.  Double running stitch gives a much neater reverse side than back stitch, and uses less thread.  The alternative name, Holbein stitch, dated from when painter Hans Holbein painted affluent patrons in their finery, with black line embroidery on their cuffs and collars in the 19th century.

We were shown various embroideries from assorted countries.  The Mamluk dynasty produced a lot of kerchiefs.  In this culture there were no pockets in garments so objects were tied into a kerchief and stuffed in a sleeve, for easy carrying.  These were decorated in double running stitch, mostly geometrics, also bird and branch band patterns (stripes are vertical, bands horizontal).  This was an Islamic culture, but it was ok to use animal imagery on textiles for general use, so long as it was not a textile for a religious artefact.

Pattern darning uses running stitch packed closely together.  This is more robust and survives longer than double running stitch.  Johann Scholsperger in 1523 printed the first textile pattern book.  He owned a textile and paper mill, and as the patterns are the same from the surviving textiles, and the embroidery pattern book, it is assumed he used the same blocks.  The V&A had one of the 3 remaining first editions.  The 2 others are at the Metropolitan Museum  in New York.

By 15th century, the was a demand for new designs.  Publishers saw the opportunity for printing textile pattern books.  Books were traded, altered and republished (to avoid copyright infringement, even in those days!) therefore designs appeared cross-continent.  Pattern books gave designs but no insturctions.  Henry VIII clothing looks like it is worked with double running stitch.  Swirly and flowing embroidery is on clothing up to 1530, and it is believed that Catherine Howard worked this on Henry VIII's clothing.

Buttonhole stitch was used on broderie anglais - a mind boggling labour intensive form of fabric.  Cutwork came into vogue in the 16th century.  Cut away an area, put in diagonal and buttonhole stitch over bars to make patterns.  Linen cloth and thread were required to make this robust.  Strong and starchable.  This became a favourite virtuous pastime for Italian gentlewoman.

Henry VIII had a massive impact on the market for embroidery.  As he changed the faith of the country from Catholic to Protestant in order to divorce Catherine of Aragon, he consequently dissolved the monasteries, which led to reduced work for professional borderers.  There were no vestments to work for the church.  By 1561, Elizabeth I had granted a Royal Charter to the Broderers Company.  Once the  Guild was functioning, they inspected work by members, and in order to maintain standards, destroyed shoddy work.  As the Elizabethan church declined, the merchant class increased.  Itinerant embroiders travelled the country, working freelance in the big houses.

Embroidery was deemed a fitting occupation for a lady, mainly in applied work, embroidery and stumpwork.  Cushions were important in the big houses.  Furniture would be wooden, and cushions were portable and added comfort.  Motifs were attached to fabrics, particularly to fabrics that were difficult to stitch through, eg velvet and silk satin.  Embroidery motifs were worked on linen, then applied using slip stitch to a ground.  These motifs "slips" were cut out and it is believed this is how slip stitch got its name.  Plant cuttings are known as slips, and most of these motifs were of small plant sections.  Also, if the ground fabric wore out, the slips could be cut off and recycled.

Mary Queen of Scots (imprisoned by Elizabeth I for 19 years) created the Oxburgh Hangings and used mottos and symbols frequently in her work.  Often worked the marigold facing the sun, as it was her personal symbol.

Elizabeth I is portrayed with blackwork sleeves laced to her bodice.  Genteel girls did geometric patterns in double running stitch, using black English silk.  This is very rare, and special care is required for the V&A archive examples.  English black silk of this date was mordanted with iron and other metallic salts, and over the last 500 years this has rotted due to the action of the mordants on silk.  Spanish silk was mordanted with less iron so has lasted longer.  Blackwork styles varied over time.  Density of pattern was popular first, then by 17th century speckle stitch was used for shading.  This is believed to copy the wood blocks of the time, which were shading by speckle and line.

We were shown an amazing image of Margaret Layton painted in 1620.  In the early 17th century fashions changed.  The jacket in the image had been made in 1610 and was completely covered in a twining flowering plant.  By 1620 waistlines had risen, so in the painting she wore an elaborate overskirt.  There were many different stitches, padding and spangles, so this was a labour intensive, very expensive piece of embroidery.  The skirt no longer exists so was probably large enough to be cut up and restyled, whereas the jacket was fitted and too small to be refashioned.  Many jacket designs were drawn and embroidered then cut out and stitched.

A selection of coifs were shown.  They were worn over the hair, either on their own when at home, or under a hat when out.  Coifs had a casing along one edge, which meant they were tied at the back of the neck, not under then chin.

Nightcaps were worn by men.  These were worn inside the house, both for fashion and warmth.  It was an item of informal clothing, worn in the evening, but not in bed. The only time men were bareheaded in imagery, was when it demonstrated madness or emotional distress.  A Biggin is a woollen hat worn in bed.

Tuesday 8 October 2013

Meeting my new tutor

I met my new tutor, Steve today.  I found my tutorial very helpful.  As I have a clear idea of my concept and originating artwork, we discussed what outcome I am aiming at.  This was a bit of a shock as I feel I have been steered away from this to date, and encouraged to think about the concept and the art, not a final destination/product.

So am I aiming at a commercial object with a statement, or an art object?  Neither really, as I am not comfortable with the purpose of the art object, neither do I want to be a commercial designer, although somewhere down the line, I can see applications from my work in both fields.  I do like exhibitions with an agenda, so maybe this is where I need to aim.  I really liked the Gay Icons exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery, as it has an inclusive message to show a diversity of inspirational people chosen by known gay people, like Elton John, Sandy Toksvig and Clare Balding.

 So I need to think about what site such an exhibition would fit with my agenda of Women's Work.  Steve suggested fitting it to somewhere like Hatfield House, but this is too old for my focus.   I am in the generation of postmodernism, after all.  So I might go back to the Jeffrey Museum and look at the 1950s room.  I have also persuaded Jim to take me to Salts Mill to see the Cloth & Memory exhibition on 26 October in Bradford, when there is a curator's tour and seminar.

So, I need to identify a site where my "exhibition with an agenda" would fit, research other artists' use of the idiosyncrasies of a site; research other artists' work about 3rd wave feminism; and apply my skills to the above.  Not a lot then!

And to keep my hands busy in the meantime, I random dyed quite a lot of muslin in marmalade colours, ready for samples in Monoprint, kantha stitchers, leading up to a rather interesting idea I have about folded cushions.

Friday 4 October 2013

Another exhausting art class with Vanda (or Vanda's lost her marbles!)

Today I am absolutely spent.  Art class yesterday has left me completely exhausted.  This is why I am a part-time student.  I cannot imagine working so hard full time, and although I am physically tired, I am still thinking about all the ground we covered yesterday.

Yesterday the four of us were working, using art techniques inspired by the Jerwood Drawing Competition entrants.  Vanda had selected 10 images from the Jerwood online exhibition catalogue, that showed interesting insights into making art.  We had to use the techniques demonstrated in our own artwork.

Beatriz Olabarietta had drawn around 2 moving marbles, bi-dextrously, using marker pens.  Unfortunately Vanda had lost her marbles, so I did the same exercise using a ball of screwed up sticky tape, using a pen and pencil.  Then I tried it with a charcoal stick and rubber.  Then I applied this technique to drawing kitchen utensils, bi-dextrously, using charcoal and rubber.  They came out with a wonderfully free feeling to them.  This was fantastically successful!  I can see a relevance of the two handed work here, as I enjoy needlepoint and knitting, both of which require a two handed action.  It also fits with my interest in how the two hands complement each other, one providing dexterity, and the other strength in most activities.  With two handed drawing, the dominant hand provides relative accuracy and competence, whereas the non-dominant hand provides a feeling of freedom.  I very much like this.

A meat roasting tin

Potato masher

Serving spoon

Draining spoon

Then I tried drawing on fabric, as shown by Jonathan Polkest who drew an upside down chair on a fabric doily.  Not greatly successful for me, but Brenda's work drawing a deconstructed shoe was wonderful.
Rather weak

Better, but not my favoured technique
Lindsay Connors had used an Inland Revenue envelope and cut out a scene that was seen through the window.  I  did this several times, using rubbings of a draining spoon and potato masher.  These got better as they progressed, with more sensitivity to cutting away the actual marks of the pencil, rather than removing big chunky areas of paper.  More thought required here about perceiving the envelope as a pocket, which would make it work as a textile.




Sharon Leahy-Clark used a piece of found paper, mounted it and "firmly asserted it was a portrait".  So I found a skeleton leaf, considered what the veins represented to me, and declared it was an artwork about depot tracks, as it looked like a railway track diagram.

Railway track diagram
Sally Webber's work was on a piece of old music score, with notes and other printed marks floating off the stave into the open space on the paper.  So I took a page of an atlas (east coast of USA) and drew into the ocean area using marks inspired by red lines marking the roads and other boundaries.  This technique definitely needed space for the hand marks to work.  Vanda commented that my Yokes textile pieces from last semester had worked because the imagery needed the large amount of clear space I had given.  I need to consider this more, as I had worried that there was not enough "work" in this textile, but actually, it needed the space to breathe.  I need to gain more confidence and understanding about to use space in my design.  I know "less is more" but still want to fill in every bit.  I have not finished thinking about how to best use space.




I am still chewing over why I want to use textile to be the medium for my artwork.  At the moment, I really don't know why.  I like handling cloth, thread and other materials.  I think of my current theme as Women's Work and feel textile is appropriate.  Elizabeth Wayland Barber,an anthropologist, wrote that women are associated with textile work from ancient times as women would be caring for children and spinning and weaving are interruptible while watching children.  Men would be away hunting and fishing, so not available for childcare and other domestic tasks, and this is the anthropological reason for the division of duties.  I am not sure that this is enough to explain it, but it is a good starting point.

The group challenged me on why my theme is Women's Work and not Domestic Work.  I am not saying men don't do cooking and cleaning, but it is most usually women who do it, and, when done by women, it is often unseen and undervalued.  I use my artwork to Recognise significant actions.   I don't want my artwork to be in panels on a wall.  I want it to be used in an everyday setting, about notable actions that are taken for granted, and the serious message of the artwork is only seen by the insightful who will recognise it for what it is.  Maybe another title for my work could be "Part of the Furniture" as  I want to apply my artwork to useful objects, and this would play on the unseen nature of Women's Work, and how it adds to the comfort of everyday life?

I can see that this theme could be taken further, with recognition of the essential but largely undervalued and unseen work done by other groups - for example, people who work sorting rubbish for recycling; cleaners; track workers, fast food restaurants.  I will stick to the Women's Work theme until the end of my degree though.

It is all the thinking that I find so exhausting.  Maybe being middle aged makes my thinking slower, because I am aware that there are many right answers, and lots of right answers need to be considered before making a conclusion.  Whereas when I was young (and stupid!) I believed in "one right answer" so needed less time for thinking as the first one I came to, was enough.

Wednesday 2 October 2013

V&A - Medieval Tapestry and Opus Anglicanum

This was another wonderful lecture at the V&A.  Jennifer Weardon started by speaking about gothic tapestries.

They were originally very large and displayed on walls in churches and cathedrals, but as building techniques changed and church windows became larger, there was less wall space.  Thus tapestries became smaller and designed to be used as long strips, banners, alter frontals.  However castles still had the big wall spaces, made of stone and undecorated so these were suited to big tapestries.  Castle walls are of varying sizes so tapestry sets were commissioned to fit individual walls.  As family fortunes changed, these tapestries would be moved and cut up to be used in other locations.  This means unaltered gothic tapestries are rare and there are only 3 complete large sets remaining.

The Apocalypse tapestry owned by the Duke of Anjou, in Angers
The 9 Heroes tapestry at The Cloisters in New York, c 1385
The Devonshire tapestry in the V&A.

Tapestries were popular in Gothic times.  The King and Princes moved around the country visiting homes of the aristocracy when following court and for battle.  Tapestries were practical, easy to fold and move as the court progressed around the country.  When battle ensued, tapestries formed part of the spoil and booty for the winning side.

Tapestry was a marker of wealth.  Castles would be cold, monochrome stone coloured, and textiles gave colour, deadened sound, gave heat insulation and demonstrated considerable affluence.  They were woven in long strips so they could be moved around as required (like the leaves on a table - extend by adding more leaves when needed).  Castles would have hooks high up on the walls, from which the tapestries would hang.  Frequently had a small repeat pattern eg fleur de lys.  Sometimes bigger tapestries would be hung around a corner of a room.  This was evidenced by a picture of a travelling court, where the tapestry clearly is too big for the wall, so is wrapped around the corner. Something never done in museums now!

It is possible there were nomadic tapestry weavers.  They would have used a low warp loom as it can be dismantled.  However when low warp looms work a design sideways, it means the tapestry wears less well as when hung, the strong warp threads run horizontally and the weaker weft takes the weight of the tapestry.  As time went on weft threads became finer.  Finer weft gives more detail.  In Gothic times, 13-15 threads per inch.  Arras weavers used finer silk threads and metal threads.  15-20 colours used.  Yellows, browns and greens fade.

Great tapestries require first class materials, excellent designers, skilled weavers, capital, rich customers and bankers.  These were abundant in Paris and Flanders, therefore they have a strong tapestry heritage.  Comparatively few have a purely religious theme.  Where they are, they are often linked to the cult of a local saint.  Saints are not marked by their names but have to be identified by symbols within the weaving.  For example St Antonius is identified by symbols - he has a halo, mitre, crozier, black and white habit of the Dominican and it was woven c1523, when he was canonised.

Jennifer Weardon touched upon a couple of idiosyncracies of representation in tapestries.  A dove is often portrayed heading towards the ear of Mary or other female saint.  Apparently Mary heard the word of God and conceived Jesus.  Therefore in Gothic times it was believed that conception took place via the ear, so women had to keep their ears covered.  And frequently in tapestries the dove is hovering around a woman's ear.  Hair was a symbol of strength (from the story of Samson) therefore any portrayal of cutting hair shows the ultimate sacrifice to God.  Esther and Ahasuerus, and Susannah and the Elders were favourite subjects in 15th Century.  Susannah was often portrayed bathing feet before a meal which was a Germanic habit at the time.

In the 14th century the Apocalypse tapestry was woven.  71 sections remain out of 90.  Amazingly they survived the French Revolution, when many affluent artefacts were destroyed.  They were defiled by being used to wrap orange trees against frost and to insulate stables but were retrieved later and conserved.

The 9 Heroes tapestry represents Jewish, Christian and Pagan heroes.  Joshua, David and Judas are Jewish; Charlemagne, Arthur and Godfrey are Christian, and Hector, Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar are Pagan.

Opus Anglicanum means English Work and describes work made between 1250 and 1350.  During this time luxury works of art across Europe focussed on depicting Christianity (money was available in this community to pay for such luxury goods). The precursor to english work has been identified from 850. The designs worked showed influence from figured silks imported from the East.  A piece of work has been identified of standing saints and prophets, worked in gold and coloured silk.  The lower border of the maniple shows St Cuthbert who was the Bishop of Winchester between 909 and 916. The next significant work known to be worked by English workers, is the Bayeaux Tapestry.  This is a secular piece of work.

Apparently there are no churches of St Thomas A Beckett.  They are all St Thomas Apostle.  Thomas A Beckett challenged King Henry II and was murdered in Canterbury Cathedral, on the King's orders.  When Henry VIII came to the throne and was arguing his position with the Pope over divorce of Catherine of Aragon, he decided to demonstrate his power towards those who historically had challenged the King. He instigated an Act of Parliament banning churches of St Thomas A Beckett (still valid today) and most of these changed their name to St Thomas Apostle.

One of the main techniques of Opus Anglicanum is underside couching.  This involves the top thread being pulled to the back of the fabric by each stitch of couching thread.  It is laborious but gives a much more flexible fabric.  Fabric that has been couched on the top of the fabric is too stiff to drape.  Also underside couching is lined to protect the couching thread, so often lasts longer as the lining takes the wear, not the threads and top fabric.

A lot of clothing was designed for the cold environment of the English church.  Opus Anglicanum is found on buskins - soft knee length boots; chasuble - vestment for mass; cope - full length cape for processions; dalmatic - T-shaped tunic; and mitre - hat, original secular, now used for high rank priests. The Orphrey is a panel(s) of embroidery applied to chasubles, copes and dalmatics.  They appear in straight, cross and Y forms, frequently straight orphrey applied to the front, and more elaborate shape at the back.  Interestingly the stole was originally a large napkin folded lengthways, used by Romans, used to wipe the hands and face.  This evolved into a 4" strip with no practical function, adopted by deacons in 7th century, which became part of liturgical dress for all clergy, worn around the neck.

In medieval times, the majority of the population was illiterate, so imagery was important to tell the stories of the scriptures.  Many panels of embroidery, and orphreys, had sequential imagery that told a Christian story.  eg John of Thanet panel 1300-1320.

Most Opus Anglicanum workshops were directed by men.  7 year apprenticeship to become a broderer.  Gregory of London achieved worldwide recognition when  his Opus Anglicanum was presented at the Vatican.

In room 9 at V&A is the Marhull Orphrey, dated 1315-1335.  It represents high status and low status people.  This can be deduced from long clothes for the rich and short clothes and hose for the poor.  Made for the Wokynden family.  Patterned hose indiates people of dubious character (not sure why).  When the embroidery is wholly covered in embroidery, it is made on a linen ground.  When it is motifs and plain background, the ground fabric is silk.  English broderers developed split stitch which means contouring around faces gives depth, form and expression. Previously couching had been vertical.  Syon Cope 1300-1320 is a wonderful example.  Very skilled work.  Green and red angels and seraphs on a coloured silk ground.

Opus Anglicanum died out around 1350.  The Black Death, 1348-51, swept across Europe wiping out between 20-70% of the population.  In London it was estimated 70% of population died.  This led to the English workshops having insufficient commissions and insufficient skilled workers led to higher wages.  Financial resources were also being put into military campaigns rather than English artefacts.  Therefore embroidery was imported instead.  There were simpler, therefore cheaper techniques used - reverting to couched work.

By 1430 some European areas were affluent again.  The court of Philip the Good in Bruges was awash with money and the Christian Order of the Golden Fleece came into being. Gold thread had become popular - a fine gold strand wound around a silk core. The embroidery of the time was shaded gold work - straight laid gold threads were overworked in colour.  Very expensive, and very extravagant in its use of gold thread (as a lot of it was overlaid in colour).  Then Or Nue came into being, to make better use of the expensive gold thread.  This is where the gold ground is shaped as required, then couched in colour, so less of the gold thread is hidden.  This made it more realistic to renaissance art.  The immense cost of creating whole scenes in gold thread meant a change in method evolved.  By 1470 a scatter motif applied to velvet was more popular.

Black textiles are rare because they degrade quickly.  Iron and tannin were used to fix dyes and black required over dyeing, which meant the natural fibres deteriorated quickly.

As Henry VIII had rejected catholicism, the representation of saints in ecclesiastical embroidery was frowned upon within the Protestant Church.  Between 1547 and 1603 Edward VI and Elizabeth I reigned as Protestant monarchs, so the market for catholic embroidery about local saints disappeared as the church no longer funded it.  Therefore there was no need to tell the stories of saints in cathedrals and on vestments.  The purpose of medieval embroidery had largely been superseded, and church embroidery was markedly changed.